Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UBERF-6224: Restore missing task types after migration to model #5094

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2024

Conversation

lexiv0re
Copy link
Collaborator

Contribution checklist

Brief description

  • Restore missing task types after migration to model

Checklist

  • - UI test added to added/changed functionality?
  • - Screenshot is added to PR if applicable ?
  • - Does a local formatting is applied (rush format)
  • - Does a local svelte-check is applied (rush svelte-check)
  • - Does a local UI tests are executed UI Testing
  • - Does the code work? Check whether function and logic are correct.
  • - Does Changelog.md is updated with changes?
  • - Does the translations are up to date?
  • - Does it well tested?
  • - Tested for Chrome.
  • - Tested for Safari.
  • - Go through the changed code looking for typos, TODOs, commented LOCs, debugging pieces of code, etc.
  • - Rebase your branch onto master and upstream branch
  • - Is there any redundant or duplicate code?
  • - Are required links are linked to PR?
  • - Does new code is well documented ?

Related issues

https://front.hc.engineering/workbench/platform/tracker/UBERF-6224

Contributor requirements

  • - Sign-off is provided. DCO
  • - GPG Signature is provided. GPG

Signed-off-by: Alexey Zinoviev <alexey.zinoviev@xored.com>
@lexiv0re lexiv0re requested a review from BykhovDenis March 29, 2024 13:02
@haiodo haiodo merged commit 16204ed into main Mar 29, 2024
7 checks passed
@haiodo haiodo deleted the uberf-6224/fix-missing-statuses branch March 29, 2024 13:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants