You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@metavibor@imagirom
It also becomes tricky with a hard cut off.
The lower cell is a clear miss, I would say.
However, the upper cell has very little virus and also responds quite little with serum binding.
Didn't we consider some border-line category which we would neither classify as infected nor control?
@tischi@imagirom I think this is a good idea, we should think of implementing a third category... so beside "infected" and "control" we can have "not classified"
{"plateName":"20200417_132123_311","siteName":"G03-0006","pixelLocation":[6732.656551374598,21068.444627786994,0.0],"analysisVersion":"06433667b2e6bbaa8118cc837e84abc6d0d5592a"}
@metavibor @imagirom
It also becomes tricky with a hard cut off.
The lower cell is a clear miss, I would say.
However, the upper cell has very little virus and also responds quite little with serum binding.
Didn't we consider some border-line category which we would neither classify as infected nor control?
Screenshot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: