Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hip73 deselection #496

Closed
Apowell11 opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 7 comments
Closed

Hip73 deselection #496

Apowell11 opened this issue Oct 20, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@Apowell11
Copy link

Would I likely become deselected as a poor validator? I am experiencing multiple install issues with the authorized Freedom Fi 5g miner installers. I have difficulty finding Knowledgeable support. On-Tech blaming technology difficulties on Freedom Fi. freedom Fi hard to reach. Customer support . On-Tech installers are on a steep learning curve that affects our effectiveness and validation quality. Are there others like me, that could experience negative impacts if Hip 73 deselection takes affect to deselect quicker? Does passage of Hip73 eliminate the smaller minors? How do I solve this issue for two minors?

@TheRealJohnMac50
Copy link
Contributor

You mention FFI 5G small cells and miners, which have nothing to do with validators, nor this HIP.

@abhay abhay closed this as completed Oct 20, 2022
@abhay abhay closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 20, 2022
@abhay
Copy link
Contributor

abhay commented Oct 20, 2022

closing. thanks @TheRealJohnMac50

@Apowell11
Copy link
Author

You mention FFI 5G small cells and miners, which have nothing to do with validators, nor this HIP.

@Apowell11
Copy link
Author

Okay. Thank you.

@TheRealJohnMac50
Copy link
Contributor

Okay. Thank you.

You're welcome 🙂👍🏻

@Apowell11
Copy link
Author

So deselection of poor validators doesn’t affect the small minor? Why are there poor validators? My apologies for my ignorance. I’m trying to learn more

@TheRealJohnMac50
Copy link
Contributor

TheRealJohnMac50 commented Oct 20, 2022

So deselection of poor validators doesn’t affect the small minor? Why are there poor validators? My apologies for my ignorance. I’m trying to learn more

In layman's terms, this HIP will ensure that poor performing validators (vals) will be more excluded from the CG (Concensus Group). Which will ensure that only better performing vals will be in the CG, that will help your (LoRa) miners better perform PoC (proof of coverage), and ultimately earn more PoC rewards. This kind of discussion may be better discussed in the Helium socials (discord, Tg, exc.) than here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants