Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Insecure sdmem command #94

Open
Lvl4Sword opened this issue Sep 22, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Insecure sdmem command #94

Lvl4Sword opened this issue Sep 22, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@Lvl4Sword
Copy link

According to the sdmem manual page:

-f     fast (and insecure mode): no /dev/urandom.

-l     lessens the security. Only two passes  are  written:  the  first
              with 0x00 and a final random one.

-l     -l  for  a  second time lessons the security even more: only one
              pass with 0x00 is written.

When the command is sdmem -fll, I don't see how this could protect against something like https://blog.f-secure.com/cold-boot-attacks/

@cyian-1756
Copy link

When the command is sdmem -fll, I don't see how this could protect against something like

The memory is still overwritten, it's just done in one pass and with 0s instead of random data. However usbkill doesn't offer much to protect against coldboot attacks considering that they attacks don't require a usb be inserted into the target machine when the machine is running

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants