You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
However, the latestPatch/patch policy should define a version requirement that only allow values in a specific "feature band" (e.g. allows 8.0.102 or any later 8.0.1xx version, such as 8.0.103 or 8.0.199, but not 8.0.403)).
The .NET SDK doesn't technically follow semantic versioning (more details here), but treating it as such (using the semver crate) is adequate for most scenarios. It seems unlikely that users will even want to specify latchPatch rather than latestFeature, but this is one edge case that we may want to account for in our version parsing logic.
Currently, the buildpack will install a more recent SDK than expected when the latestPatch roll-forward policy is defined (and a more recent "feature band" release is available), and dotnet publish will throw an error as a result.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We currently treat
patch
/latestPatch
andfeature
/latestFeature
roll-forward policies equally.However, the
latestPatch
/patch
policy should define a version requirement that only allow values in a specific "feature band" (e.g. allows 8.0.102 or any later 8.0.1xx version, such as 8.0.103 or 8.0.199, but not 8.0.403)).The .NET SDK doesn't technically follow semantic versioning (more details here), but treating it as such (using the
semver
crate) is adequate for most scenarios. It seems unlikely that users will even want to specifylatchPatch
rather thanlatestFeature
, but this is one edge case that we may want to account for in our version parsing logic.Currently, the buildpack will install a more recent SDK than expected when the
latestPatch
roll-forward policy is defined (and a more recent "feature band" release is available), anddotnet publish
will throw an error as a result.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: