-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 701
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
v0.25.0 Release watch #811
Comments
Does #787 have any plans? @kamikazechaser |
@shuqingzai I'd put it for the next release. Anyways after v0.25.0 I expect development and feature releases to be much much faster as we would have sorted some of the main blockers. |
I hope to add a feature that automatically sets the client name when asynq connects to redis, which makes it convenient to check the connection status of asynq on redis. Thank you. |
@kamikazechaser do you think #868 can end up in this release? This change is a significant performance improvement, and is pretty common practice. |
@pior There are a few related issues/PRs to that. But most likely not. I'll post an update on this release by next week. |
All right 👍 We would really prefer an active Asynq repo, to maintaining a fork 🙏 |
Just quick update, v0.25.0 will be prepped for release next week. You can expect it to be out within the next 2 weeks. Additionally, new major feature changes PRs will be first merged into the |
Sweet! |
Yeah, pretty much all new useful features that also need time for continuous feedback (smoke testing sort of branch). |
I don't have permissions to push to forks. So, there is a bit of hold up on small issues that need resolving on those PRs. But by the end of the week I'll change the base, merge them on a different one so that we can proceed with closing this issue asap. |
what's the plan of v0.25? It seems that many issues are needed to be fixed. |
when release the v0.25? |
lots of archived task are left in redis and cost memory all the time. So hope we can fix this issue asap. |
Also hoping to see some progress here 🙏 |
Hey! We're thinking of using this library to build an async service but wanted to know the current status. I see there hasn't been much activity in the past six months, so we just wanted to know whether it's still being actively supported. |
@kamikazechaser @hibiken Do you think we can find a better maintenance model? |
All the pending PRs have been merged with the exception of #534 (there is an issue with it). In any case, it is not a "must-have" feature at the moment. I'll be adding other PR's as well for v0.25.0. @pior I agree. I personally reduced use of this library because of certain issue with Redis itself, But I want to see it up to date in any case. Do you have any ideas? |
@kamikazechaser sorry for the late response, but I did not want to answer this question too quickly. I can dedicate a few hours per week to help you maintain Asynq. I want to push for stability, performance and code quality. I think I can help by providing feedbacks to PR authors, doing some work myself (like what I already started doing). For the v0.25.0 release: if we're ready, I can work on updating the deps, the changelog and the version. |
v0.25.0 will be released this week. In the meanwhile, anyone can test on the @master release and check if there are any issues. I have updated the Also please review #950 in case I have missed out any notable feature or fix. The next "major" release (v0.26.0) may come next year around Feb (When 1.24 is released). The |
I did not see anything missing from the changelog 👍 |
I'll add you last PR into the change-log as well. We can wait a day for anyone using |
Thanks @kamikazechaser 💯 |
This is a tracker of when v0.25.0 is expected to be released.
Docs and dependencies:
base.go
VersionPending PRs:
Pending Issues:
To test the latest changes, you can always install from the
@master
branch.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: