-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 719
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Order of task execution #871
Comments
Well there are ways to achieve something similar. Forcing lower concurrency, checking previous task status in task handlers. But there are no guarantees in any case. |
That is sad, I mean this is meant to be a queue. In theory when there is only one process that executes the tasks, then the order of the executions should be the same order as they were inserted in the queue. Am I missing here something? |
@dikdom what you are looking for is called a workflow. |
what you generally want is kind of like a state machine inside a queue handler |
Hello,
is there any guarantee of the task execution order depending on the enqueue order?
I know this sounds silly as this is a queue but unfortunately I have some contradicting experience. Shall I continue investigating my setup or there is no guarantee of the order of the task executions?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: