Better support for VSC

[poesel]

Now that all code is in /src there is only one step missing to be able to seamlessly use VSC: either move dist-packages into src (there is probaly some thelogical reason not to do this ;) ) or just link the directory into src (that is what I do).

[amotl]

Dear @poesel,

we can well move dist-packages into the src folder and finally add a pymakr.conf (#32).

With kind regards,
Andreas.

[poesel]

If dist-packages is in /src there is no need for a pymakr.conf because everything in /src will have to be synced to the MCU. Well except if you want to exclude syncing the pycache directories that are created through 'make test'. But since its only the directories and not their contents its a mere nuisance.

[poesel]

so are we going to move /dist-packages into /src or not?

[poesel]

?

[amotl]

Dear @poesel,

we might well consider that in the future. Currently, due to other obligations elsewhere but also within Terkin, I don't think I will able to dedicate myself to that.

But in case I would touch that, should we call the directory src/dist-packages or src/site-packages, see [1]?

Apart from that, shall we also put lib-mpy into src/site-packages-mpy then?

With kind regards,
Andreas.

[1] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9387928/whats-the-difference-between-dist-packages-and-site-packages

[poesel]

I don't think it makes a difference here. So don't change anything. Only creates confusion.

Putting the mpys there, too, makes sense (although mpy are not strictly source files :) ). If everything is under one root directory you can sync it with pymakr.

No rush. I just wanted to know if we do it or not.