-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
database1.txt
76 lines (61 loc) · 10 KB
/
database1.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
Introduction
Agriculture is one the most significant things for Human beings as it is providing us with food. Crop cultivation is dependent on the quality and nutrients of the soil, and growing land cultivation results in a lack of supplements present in the soil. Soil is very important in crop cultivation. Plants, plants, minerals, and living creatures all benefit from it.
Therefore, the importance of accurate soil classification in agricultural productivity and environmental sustainability has never been more apparent. In the rapidly advancing field of agricultural science, precision and accuracy in soil classification have become paramount due to their significant impact on agricultural productivity and environmental management.
Kazheen Ismael Taher and colleagues' research paper focuses on exploring various classification algorithms to enhance the predictability and accuracy of soil classification. Classification is a data mining technique that analyses a given dataset and places each instance in the class with the least level of classification error. From a dataset, it is used to create models that accurately represent key data groups.
The study is particularly important amidst global challenges in agriculture and resource management, accurately predicting soil characteristics using sophisticated algorithms can offer significant improvements in strategic agricultural planning and sustainability initiatives.
The classification method divides the soil data into separate groups based on certain predefined criteria. Then by applying sophisticated data mining algorithms, the research aims to identify the most effective methods for classifying soil based on various attributes, which are essential for guiding decisions in agricultural management and policy-making.
This paper discussed four DM algorithms for the classification of soil data: DT, NB, K-NN, and RF algorithm. The WEKA environment was used to apply these techniques to the collected soil data and the results were compared and analysed.
Abstract:
This research paper employs several sophisticated data mining classification algorithms to predict soil data, which is fundamental for informing agricultural strategies and sustainable practices, and investigates the effectiveness of various data mining classification algorithms in predicting soil data.
The research paper utilizes four distinct data mining classification algorithms—Naive Bayes, K-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), Random Forest, and J48 Decision Tree—to analyse soil data collected from various sources. These classifier algorithms are used to extract information from soil data.
The study's primary aim is to assess the effectiveness of these algorithms in accurately classifying soil types, an essential task for enhancing agricultural practices and management strategies. Among the tested algorithms, K-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN) demonstrated the highest accuracy with an 84% success rate when compared to the NB (69.23%), DT and RF (53.85 %), suggesting its potential superiority in handling complex datasets involving multifaceted soil attributes. This finding positions k-NN as a potentially valuable tool for agricultural data scientists and soil specialists seeking reliable classification methods.
DATA SOURCE AND PARTICULARS SOIL DATASET
Soil data was collected from Soil Science Department, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. The data contains 400 soil samples from the North West zone of Nigeria. The soil extracted data used in the related studies included moisture content, liquid limit, clay content, plastic index, plastic limit, and consistency index.
CLASSIFICATION OF SOIL
Soil classification is the formal categorization of soils focused on distinguishing characteristics as well as criteria that govern consumption choices.
The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) is a common way to classify soils used in engineering. It divides soils into three main types:
Coarse-grained soils: These are soils with bigger particles like sand and gravel.
Fine-grained soils: These are soils with smaller particles like silt and clay.
Highly organic soils: These are soils made mostly of decomposed plant material, called "peat."
Each of these types can be further divided into subgroups based on specific characteristics like color, moisture content, and weight.
REVIEW ( Extensive Methodology and Algorithms Analysis )
To discuss the data mining classification algorithms employed in soil data analysis:
1. k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN)
• Application: This algorithm is applied to categorize types of soil by assessing the similarities between a given sample and its closest neighbors in the dataset.
• Functionality: k-NN determines the classification of a sample based on the most frequent category among its nearest k samples. It does not build a conventional model but instead uses the entire dataset for classification, making it simple yet powerful when data has distinct clusters.
• Effectiveness: In the research, k-NN was the most accurate in predicting soil types, suggesting its robustness in scenarios where proximity in feature space correlates strongly with similar categorizations.
2. Random Forest (RF)
• Application: RF is utilized for classifying soil samples by generating several decision trees and aggregating their outcomes to enhance the prediction's reliability.
• Functionality: This method constructs multiple trees from randomly selected subsets of the dataset and features. It then uses averaging to improve predictive accuracy and control over-fitting, which is a common problem in decision trees.
• Effectiveness: Although RF did not match k-NN in performance metrics, it is notable for handling overfitting and being effective across diverse datasets.
3. Decision Tree (DT)
• Application: DTs are employed to model predictions on soil types through a series of binary decisions made on the feature values.
• Functionality: The decision tree algorithm segments the dataset into smaller subsets while at the same time an associated decision tree is incrementally developed. The final result is a tree with decision nodes and leaf nodes that represent classifications.
• Effectiveness: In the context of this study, DTs performed on par with RF but were not as effective as k-NN, highlighting their susceptibility to variations in dataset quality and size.
4. Naïve Bayes (NB)
• Application: NB classifier predicts soil type by applying probability theory and assuming that features within the dataset operate independently from one another.
• Functionality: Based on Bayes’ theorem, NB calculates the probability of each class based on feature independence, making it computationally efficient and easy to implement.
• Effectiveness: Despite its lower performance compared to k-NN, NB is valued for its speed and efficiency, especially in large datasets where computational simplicity is crucial.
EXPERIMENTS RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Based on the training data collection, the weighted average of the True Positive Rate of the K-NN classifier is 0.848. When the Naïve Bayes, DT, and RF TP Rates are 0.692, 0.538, and 0.538, respectively, it suggests a low level.
As a result, the data collection was automatically labelled in a higher context by the K -NN classifier, suggesting that feature proximity plays a significant role in accurate soil classification. The choice of algorithm should consider the specific data characteristics and the analytical goals to optimize outcomes in agricultural data applications.
The study aimed to identify the most effective method for this purpose, leading to the finding that k-NN outperformed the others in accuracy. However, the other algorithms still provided valuable insights and could be preferable under different circumstances or data conditions. Here are the key points concerning the other algorithms used in the soil data analysis, aside from k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN):
Random Forest (RF):
Effective in reducing overfitting by averaging multiple decision trees.
Handles high-dimensional data well due to its ensemble approach.
Less susceptible to noise in the data.
Decision Tree (DT):
Provides clear and simple to understand decision rules.
Can be visualized easily, which aids in interpreting the model’s decision-making process.
Sensitive to changes in the data, which can lead to variability in performance.
Naïve Bayes (NB):
Extremely fast and efficient, making it suitable for large datasets.
Works well with an assumption of independence among features.
Despite simplicity, often effective enough for many practical scenarios.
Scope for Future Development
The implications of this study are vast, offering numerous opportunities for future research and practical applications:
1. Development of Advanced Hybrid Models: There is potential for developing new, more sophisticated models that integrate the strengths of multiple classification algorithms to handle increasingly complex datasets.
2. Implementation in IoT for Real-Time Monitoring: Integrating these algorithms into IoT-based systems could facilitate real-time soil monitoring, drastically enhancing the responsiveness and adaptability of agricultural practices to changing soil conditions.
3. Global Application and Testing: Expanding the testing of these algorithms on a global scale could help in fine-tuning the models to various ecological and climatic conditions, increasing their utility and accuracy worldwide.
Conclusion
This research provides a comprehensive analysis of various data mining classification algorithms for soil data, with significant implications for agricultural sciences and practices. The standout performance of the k-NN algorithm highlights its potential in practical applications, particularly in precision agriculture. The detailed examination of each algorithm's capabilities and limitations further enriches the academic and practical understanding of soil classification challenges and solutions. The findings of this study not only contribute to the scientific community but also pave the way for future innovations in agricultural technology and sustainable farming practices.