Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Value Sets are draft; will be refined with Swiss Rad. Society #22

Open
JBleuer opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Value Sets are draft; will be refined with Swiss Rad. Society #22

JBleuer opened this issue Sep 23, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@JBleuer
Copy link
Collaborator

JBleuer commented Sep 23, 2021

No description provided.

@PeroGrgic
Copy link
Collaborator

Value Set will be refined for the next release. Issue closed.

@JBleuer
Copy link
Collaborator Author

JBleuer commented Jan 26, 2022

The follwing issues are subsumed here:

=============

QuestionnaireResponse.item[9].item[0].answer[0] (l688/c36) | error | Der angegebeneWert (http://www.radlex.org::RID10345) ist nicht in den imFragebogen gesetzten options value set enthalten.

QuestionnaireResponse.item[10].item[0].answer0 | error | Der angegebeneWert (http://www.radlex.org::RID1243) ist nicht in den imFragebogen gesetzten options value set enthalten.

QuestionnaireResponse.item[10].item[1].answer0 | error | Der angegebeneWert (http://www.radlex.org::RID2468) ist nicht in den imFragebogen gesetzten options value set enthalten.


These are known Radlex-Issues which we can not solve ourselves. JBl will contact the responsible Institution.

==================

Caveat.drugPrescritpion (As discussed with Pero,):

Theres are no codes for "Prescription of B-Blockers" and "Prescription of Metformin" in Snomed.

Such codes will be created by eHealth Suisse later; preliminary, the codes for the substances (B-Blochers and Metformin) are used.

@oliveregger
Copy link
Collaborator

the codes will be integrated in utg, see https://github.com/HL7/UTG/compare/UP-252-add-radlex-to-tho-per-hta

@PeroGrgic PeroGrgic removed the final review by eHS check by eHS and if OK, close issue label Feb 1, 2022
@JBleuer JBleuer self-assigned this Feb 2, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants