You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It should start by using the "memory" backend implementation for testing. We can set up the config to allow true networking at a later time.
I changed my mind. It'd be nice if the "core" k2 crate didn't have a dependency on tx5. We should re-implement a memory stub tx module for the first iteration, and later can create the production crate that brings in tx5.
AC:
the tx module api allows:
sending a notify message to a remote
handling incoming notify messages
sending preflight messages
handling incoming preflight messages
sending module specific messages
registering a runtime handler for receiving module specific messages
the stub tx module implementation allows all the above functionality within a local process only
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This module is the k2 abstraction around tx5.
It should start by using the "memory" backend implementation for testing. We can set up the config to allow true networking at a later time.I changed my mind. It'd be nice if the "core" k2 crate didn't have a dependency on tx5. We should re-implement a memory stub tx module for the first iteration, and later can create the production crate that brings in tx5.
AC:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: