We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi: 无意中看到这个博客,很感谢作者高质量的文章。 看到这个文章https://github.com/hustcat/hustcat.github.io/blob/master/_posts/2015-04-08-xfs-performance-problem.md,有点不能理解,为什么xfs的性能问题,会导致磁盘的利用率计算出来是100%呢? 磁盘的利用率应该是从block layer开始的统计,如果xfs上产生性能问题,请求到不了block layer,理论上不应该是100%的使用率才对。不知道怎么理解这个数据呢?希望能够解惑下,谢谢。
@hustcat @yeyin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
看了下ioutil的计算,只要有IO请求在处理,就会给对应设备加上io_tick。因为xfs的性能问题,导致了io请求几乎串行到block层,所以ioutil算出来会是100%。
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi:
无意中看到这个博客,很感谢作者高质量的文章。
看到这个文章https://github.com/hustcat/hustcat.github.io/blob/master/_posts/2015-04-08-xfs-performance-problem.md,有点不能理解,为什么xfs的性能问题,会导致磁盘的利用率计算出来是100%呢?
磁盘的利用率应该是从block layer开始的统计,如果xfs上产生性能问题,请求到不了block layer,理论上不应该是100%的使用率才对。不知道怎么理解这个数据呢?希望能够解惑下,谢谢。
@hustcat @yeyin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: