fix(codec): Remove custom content-type #104
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This removes custom content-types in favor of just using `application/grpc`. There is some confusion around the specification but most grpc implementations ignore the `+` and anything after.
rabbitinspace
pushed a commit
to satelit-project/tonic
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 1, 2020
This removes custom content-types in favor of just using `application/grpc`. There is some confusion around the specification but most grpc implementations ignore the `+` and anything after.
brentalanmiller
pushed a commit
to brentalanmiller/tonic
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 6, 2023
* add 'get_ref()' and 'get_mut()' to 'Accept' * add 'get_ref()' and 'get_mut()' to 'Connect'
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This removes custom content-types in favor of
just using
application/grpc. There is someconfusion around the specification but most
grpc implementations ignore the
+andanything after.
This also adds a new
gcpexample that showshow one can talk ot GCP gRPC based apis.
Most of this example was based on @Hirevo's work!
Closes #100