Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Build Fails Due to Dependency Version Mismatch #50

Open
deer8888 opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Build Fails Due to Dependency Version Mismatch #50

deer8888 opened this issue Feb 20, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@deer8888
Copy link

Description

While rebuilding the project using the latest version of Go, with Go's official recommendation to use gomodule for initialization and building, we found that the build process fails due to mismatched module path.

The following error log was produced during the build process:

......
go: found honnef.co/go/js/xhr in honnef.co/go/js/xhr v0.0.0-20150307031022-00e3346113ae
go: found github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs/js in github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs v1.17.2
go: github.com/iafan/goplayspace/client imports
        github.com/gopherjs/vecty: github.com/gopherjs/vecty@v0.6.0: parsing go.mod:
        module declares its path as: github.com/hexops/vecty
                but was required as: github.com/gopherjs/vecty

Result

The build fails with errors related to mismatched module path.

The error dependency is github.com/gopherjs/vecty.

Reason

The error log suggests module path declaration github.com/hexops/vecty in go.mod, which is inconsistent with import path github.com/gopherjs/vecty .

Proposed Solution

To resolve this issue, we analyzed the project and identified the correct versions of the required dependencies.

The analysis shows that the correct declaration for the dependency is replace github.com/gopherjs/vecty => github.com/hexops/vecty v0.6.1-0.20221016213642-12140cfee120. This version is the latest version of the dependency.

Consider adopting this suggested version to prevent other developers from encountering build failures when constructing the project.

This information can be documented in the README.md file or another relevant location.

Additional Suggestions

To ensure reproducible builds and align with the evolving trends of the Go programming language, it is recommended that the current project be migrated to the Go module mechanism.

Updating to the go module mechanism allows for managing third-party dependency versions through the go.mod file, which provides a centralized and consistent way to specify dependency constraints.

We have generated a go.mod file with the correct versions of the third-party dependencies needed for this project.

The suggested go.mod file is as follows:


replace github.com/kisielk/gotool => github.com/kisielk/gotool v1.0.0

require github.com/rogpeppe/go-internal v1.13.1 // indirect

replace github.com/gopherjs/vecty => github.com/hexops/vecty v0.6.1-0.20221016213642-12140cfee120

require github.com/gopherjs/gopherjs v0.0.0-20171102024453-077f6d61e041

require (
	github.com/gopherjs/vecty v0.0.0-00010101000000-000000000000
	github.com/iafan/syntaxhighlight v0.0.0-20170607222035-4e4300d099e1
	honnef.co/go/js/xhr v0.0.0-20150307031022-00e3346113ae
)

require (
	github.com/hexops/vecty v0.6.0 // indirect
	github.com/kr/pretty v0.3.1 // indirect
	github.com/sourcegraph/annotate v0.0.0-20160123013949-f4cad6c6324d // indirect
	github.com/sourcegraph/syntaxhighlight v0.0.0-20170531221838-bd320f5d308e // indirect
	honnef.co/go/js/util v0.0.0-20150216223935-96b8dd9d1621 // indirect
)

Additional Information:

This issue was identified as part of our research project focused on automating the analysis of GOPATH projects to provide accurate dependency versions for seamless migration to Go Modules. We value your feedback and would appreciate any comments or suggestions regarding this approach.

@deer8888
Copy link
Author

Looking forward to your response!

Could we update README.md to help other developers use the Go module to build the projects or submit pull requests with go.mod to apply our suggestions?
@iafan

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant