Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 7, 2021. It is now read-only.

Geofencing data in GBFS feeds #247

Open
evansiroky opened this issue Aug 31, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Geofencing data in GBFS feeds #247

evansiroky opened this issue Aug 31, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@evansiroky
Copy link
Collaborator

Two of the 7 eScooters that we are consuming GBFS feeds for has partially implemented MobilityData/gbfs#92 to include geofencing data. One of those companies has reversed the lat/lons, so until that is fixed, their data is unusable. However, the other company has the following dropoff area:

Screen Shot 2019-08-30 at 5 11 18 PM

This area is inconsistent with what we've been using for the manually defined allowable dropoff area.

Furthermore, one other company has been operating eScooters in the Milwaukie area, but hasn't implemented the geofencing as a part of their GBFS. Thus the trip planner is currently plans trips in two ways that are contrary to on-the-ground eScooter company operations. The first is allowing dropoffs where they probably aren't allowed for the company with geofencing data. The second is not allowing dropoffs for the company that operates outside of Portland, but hasn't included that data in their GBFS feed.

There is ongoing work among numerous people to update the GBFS, so OTP will need to be updated once an updated version of the GBFS is published where all companies provide enough data.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant