You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the singlezone commercial hydronic test case, the occupancy seems to be misaligned to the temperature set points in the typical heating scenario (occupancy during weekend, no occupancy during week days). However, this issue doesn't show in the peak heating scenario where occupancy and temperature set points are in line.
Here is a plot that shows the upper and lower temperature profile as well as the occupancy in the typical heating scenario:
For comparison, here is a plot for the peak heating scenario:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, I think so. I fixed an issue with some missing days in the data.
However, be aware that this is real occupancy data, so there might be days with low occupancy that are not picked up by the HVAC control (due to holidays).
In the singlezone commercial hydronic test case, the occupancy seems to be misaligned to the temperature set points in the typical heating scenario (occupancy during weekend, no occupancy during week days). However, this issue doesn't show in the peak heating scenario where occupancy and temperature set points are in line.
Here is a plot that shows the upper and lower temperature profile as well as the occupancy in the typical heating scenario:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0070d/0070d5571c9a852284171329484e9f0591a97c9e" alt="Image"
For comparison, here is a plot for the peak heating scenario:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81962/81962e233b788cad75ee1642ce56664f676990fb" alt="Image"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: