Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for the ICAT schema extensions expected in icat.server 5.0 #73

Closed
RKrahl opened this issue May 12, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #106
Closed

Add support for the ICAT schema extensions expected in icat.server 5.0 #73

RKrahl opened this issue May 12, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #106
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@RKrahl
Copy link
Member

RKrahl commented May 12, 2020

There are several schema extensions proposed for icat.server, see for instance icatproject/icat.server#200, icatproject/icat.server#228, icatproject/icat.server#230, and icatproject/icat.server#231. It is expected that there will a release 5.0 of icat.server with a revised schema. Obviously, python-icat must add support for it on the client side.

The entity classes are created dynamically based on the entity information queried from the server and thus, the core of python-icat should support a modified schema right away without modifications. But the icatdump script or more precisely, the icat.dump_queries module will need to take new entity classes and modified relations into account.

@RKrahl RKrahl added enhancement New feature or request blocked Another issue needs to solved before working on this one labels May 12, 2020
@RKrahl
Copy link
Member Author

RKrahl commented May 12, 2020

Obviously this can only be done if icat.server 5.0 has been released, hence the blocked label.

@RKrahl RKrahl added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Jul 14, 2020
@RKrahl RKrahl removed the blocked Another issue needs to solved before working on this one label Nov 23, 2022
@RKrahl RKrahl linked a pull request Nov 23, 2022 that will close this issue
@RKrahl RKrahl closed this as completed Nov 23, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant