Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conda after version 4.4 changes behavior #616

Closed
5 of 10 tasks
PaulTalbot-INL opened this issue Apr 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed
5 of 10 tasks

Conda after version 4.4 changes behavior #616

PaulTalbot-INL opened this issue Apr 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Labels
priority_critical task This tag should be used for any new capability, improvement or enanchment

Comments

@PaulTalbot-INL
Copy link
Collaborator


Issue Description

Starting with conda version 4.4, the bashrc edit to make conda available changes from a path modification to a script running.

As a result, which conda no longer returns anything even if it exists. This nullifies the script raven/scripts/establish_conda_env.sh because it checks for conda's existence using "which".


For Change Control Board: Issue Review

This review should occur before any development is performed as a response to this issue.

  • 1. Is it tagged with a type: defect or improvement?
  • 2. Is it tagged with a priority: critical, normal or minor?
  • 3. If it will impact requirements or requirements tests, is it tagged with requirements?
  • 4. If it is a defect, can it cause wrong results for users? If so an email needs to be sent to the users.
  • 5. Is a rationale provided? (Such as explaining why the improvement is needed or why current code is wrong.)

For Change Control Board: Issue Closure

This review should occur when the issue is imminently going to be closed.

  • 1. If the issue is a defect, is the defect fixed?
  • 2. If the issue is a defect, is the defect tested for in the regression test system? (If not explain why not.)
  • 3. If the issue can impact users, has an email to the users group been written (the email should specify if the defect impacts stable or master)?
  • 4. If the issue is a defect, does it impact the latest stable branch? If yes, is there any issue tagged with stable (create if needed)?
  • 5. If the issue is being closed without a merge request, has an explanation of why it is being closed been provided?
@PaulTalbot-INL PaulTalbot-INL added priority_normal task This tag should be used for any new capability, improvement or enanchment labels Apr 19, 2018
@alfoa
Copy link
Collaborator

alfoa commented Sep 14, 2019

This is an important issue...
Did we address it yet or planning to in the near near future?

@PaulTalbot-INL
Copy link
Collaborator Author

PaulTalbot-INL commented Sep 24, 2019

I think we addressed this, as far as I'm aware, via the "conda-defs" and ravenrc storage. Closed by #618.

It looks like the PR accidentally listed itself to close instead of this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
priority_critical task This tag should be used for any new capability, improvement or enanchment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants