Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

link fest #244

Closed
martinthomson opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed

link fest #244

martinthomson opened this issue Jan 17, 2023 · 6 comments

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Collaborator

Comment by @paulwouters

It seems some automated tooling was used to creating links within the document, eg for "key configuration": 7 times in Section 3, pointing to a few lines below in section 3.1, and even one time within section 3.1 itself pointing recursively back to itself, and 3 more times in section 3.2, and then I stopped counting.

The same for things like "client", Oblivious Gateway Resource", etc etc culminating in Section 5 that's more blue than black, making the blue links, uhm, oblivious :P

@martinthomson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There are a few tooling changes that might be worth pursuing here, but I don't intend to make any changes in response to this issue.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@paulwouters
Copy link

I believe the tooling used still creates a large number of useless and distracting links in the document. I've created an agenda item to this weeks IESG's Informal meeting to discuss this.

@cabo
Copy link

cabo commented Mar 14, 2023

Was there any outcome of the IESG discussion?

(The tooling does what it is told to do. Auto-creating links obviously needs to be applied sparingly...
We did have some discussion about making auto-created links less visible/inviting than manually created ones, but RFCXML is not very flexible here.)

@cabo
Copy link

cabo commented Mar 14, 2023

Oh, that change actually happened:

ietf-tools/xml2rfc@dbdda51

In xml2rfc 3.17.0.

@martinthomson
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Steps have been taken. The index remains problematic, but that's (again) on xml2rfc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants