Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pcg website's pcg-c download link: use github's automated zipball #6

Open
listx opened this issue May 10, 2015 · 4 comments
Open

pcg website's pcg-c download link: use github's automated zipball #6

listx opened this issue May 10, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@listx
Copy link

listx commented May 10, 2015

We should probably use git to tag a release, and then provide 2 links on the website: (1) zipball for the tagged release (something like https://help.github.com/articles/linking-to-releases/) and (2) zipball for master.

(2) is easy to do right away because it already exists: https://github.com/imneme/pcg-c/zipball/master.

(1) requires creating a tagged commit, then pushing it here, and then linking it using the 'zipball' syntax somehow.

I just think it's better to do this as it is more automated and also offloads the storage/bandwidth (however trivial) from pcg-random.org to github.

@imneme
Copy link
Owner

imneme commented May 25, 2019

This is indeed true and on the to-be-fixed list.

@Ivoz
Copy link

Ivoz commented Jun 24, 2019

@imneme it seems you've done some great work incorporating changes recently [thanks!]; maybe you would like to consider applying this issue as a finishing step now?

Apply a tag(s) (0.99? 1.0? whatever, really) for the current code state, and/or also do a github release (where you can upload arbitary codeballs if you like) and then I would suggest you could update your website to point to the new code?

https://help.github.com/en/articles/creating-releases would be useful if you would like to keep the previous convention on your website where you released different zips for different language compatibility. Otherwise a tag / release of the current codebase would be fine.

@imneme
Copy link
Owner

imneme commented Jun 25, 2019

Yes, it's something I'll be moving to do in the next week or so. Feel free to prod me if it's not done in a timely way.

@Ivoz
Copy link

Ivoz commented Jul 11, 2019

@imneme you said you wouldn't mind a prod, so here's one :D

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants