You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am new to log15 and currently evaluating it for a new project. One of the first things I did was make a convenience functions that would allow logging from contexts (in an http server). Example:
The problem is that the convenience function is the caller of logger.Error and therefore anything relating to the file and line numbers is less than useful. Now, if I wanted to, I could create a handler that fixes this, but the problem is I don't know that logging will always be done from one of my convenience functions. In fact, I expect it to often not be. I propose the following method be added to log15.Logger interface:
This would allow my convenience functions to work while not breaking anything. I would be happy to submit a PR if you agree to the change. Also, wording is open to change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've got similar issues - I want to use log15 for a library that accepts a Func(string) as its logging function, so at the moment all my logs are coming out with the wrapper function's location.
I think that if the existing stack depth can be exposed, then most of what you want can be dealt with by creating a new logger. E.g.
I am new to log15 and currently evaluating it for a new project. One of the first things I did was make a convenience functions that would allow logging from contexts (in an http server). Example:
The problem is that the convenience function is the caller of logger.Error and therefore anything relating to the file and line numbers is less than useful. Now, if I wanted to, I could create a handler that fixes this, but the problem is I don't know that logging will always be done from one of my convenience functions. In fact, I expect it to often not be. I propose the following method be added to log15.Logger interface:
This would allow my convenience functions to work while not breaking anything. I would be happy to submit a PR if you agree to the change. Also, wording is open to change.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: