Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

JVM target for the library could be bump higher #124

Closed
Ouriel opened this issue Jul 21, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

JVM target for the library could be bump higher #124

Ouriel opened this issue Jul 21, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement what can we do better?

Comments

@Ouriel
Copy link
Contributor

Ouriel commented Jul 21, 2021

Today the compilation target is Java 1.8 maybe you could target higher version with Jave 11 being the last LTS and 16 out since few month.
@geomagilles
Copy link
Collaborator

geomagilles commented Jul 21, 2021 •
edited
Loading

The compilation target is 1.8 because some code should end up in Pulsar functions that support only 1.8.
I remember that some recent improvement in the Pulsar codebase should make it compatible with the higher java version - but it has to be confirmed. See eg. apache/pulsar#8445

@geomagilles geomagilles added the enhancement what can we do better? label Jul 21, 2021
@geomagilles
Copy link
Collaborator

use Java 11 since 0.9.5

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement what can we do better?
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@geomagilles @Ouriel