-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 125
[Question Only] Is it usable with InfluxDB 2.0 #139
Comments
Same question here? |
No, it won't work; though work has begun on a client for 2.x. Please bare with us. I'll keep this issue updated over the coming days and weeks. |
I'm the interim, we suggest using Telegraf as a proxy. https://www.influxdata.com/blog/influxdb-2-migration-path-instrumentation/ |
This is a little offtopic, please advise if there's a better place to ask. The link above suggests to use Telegraf for relaying. Thats good to know! However, I already have |
You'd need to use the namepass/namedrop parameters on your 2 different InfluxDB outputs, or use a separate instance of Telegraf |
Example in this issue: |
Thank you! Joined influxdata/telegraf#1778 which seems to have a more detailed discussion. |
Unfortunately, as the docs say:
As I'm periodically copying from another DB to influx (v1 at the moment) and need to know the last point written (i.e. do a query) that won't work :/ |
Is there any update on InfluxDB 2.0 compatibility? |
@jadamroth No, not at the moment. With our recent beta announcement, this will change very soon 👍 |
Hey @rawkode , any updates on timeline? |
Hi @jadamroth, we started working on influxdb-client-php for InfluxDB 2... first results coming soon Regards |
Hello,
I'm using InfluxDB 1.7 with this PHP SDK, and it's working fine.
I want to upgrade to InfluxDB 2.0, so will it work with v2?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: