Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Query Bug report #10208

Closed
tinycolds opened this issue Aug 19, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

Query Bug report #10208

tinycolds opened this issue Aug 19, 2018 · 3 comments

Comments

@tinycolds
Copy link

tinycolds commented Aug 19, 2018

Bug report

System info:
Influxdb: 1.5.3
SySTEM: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.43-2+deb8u5 (2017-09-19) x86_64 GNU/Linux

Steps to reproduce:
1. We have time series data like:

time                           field1
----                           ------
2018-08-06T07:38:05.276919173Z 1

Expected behavior:
1. We use query like:

SELECT sum(filed1), count(filed1) FROM "test1" where time > now() - 5m GROUP BY time(5m, 0s) fill(0) order by time desc;

2. Expected result is sum(filed1) equals count(filed1)

Actual behavior:
However, sometimes we doesn't get the right result:

time                 sum   count
----                 ---   -----
2018-08-19T09:30:00Z 37559 37643
2018-08-19T09:25:00Z 14661 14661

But after serveral seconds, query again, get the right result:

time                 sum   count
----                 ---   -----
2018-08-19T09:30:00Z 38086 38086
2018-08-19T09:25:00Z 14183 14183
@tinycolds
Copy link
Author

any update?

@tinycolds tinycolds changed the title Query bug Query Bug report Sep 2, 2018
@dgnorton dgnorton added the 1.x label Jan 7, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 24, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Jul 24, 2019
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jul 31, 2019

This issue has been automatically closed because it has not had recent activity. Please reopen if this issue is still important to you. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot closed this as completed Jul 31, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants