Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expvar support? #1252

Closed
mperham opened this issue Dec 19, 2014 · 3 comments
Closed

Expvar support? #1252

mperham opened this issue Dec 19, 2014 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@mperham
Copy link

mperham commented Dec 19, 2014

Go provides a way to track and publish built-in memory metrics in the expvar package. Since this is the official way to do it, would InfluxDB consider enabling it so visualization tools like Inspeqtor Pro can provide realtime dashboards for this data? I'd love to see this automatically supported for InfluxDB:

dashboard

@otoolep
Copy link
Contributor

otoolep commented Dec 19, 2014

I agree that we need to do something like this. Having a system that is itself easy to monitor and manage is very important to me (and the team). I'll make sure the implementation for 0.9.0 meets this need. Since we prefer to use standard packages over third-party packages, expvar is an obvious choice for much of this work.

@otoolep otoolep self-assigned this Dec 19, 2014
@otoolep otoolep added this to the 0.9.0 milestone Dec 19, 2014
@Dieterbe
Copy link
Contributor

FWIW a lot of discussion around instrumentation happened in #635
I think one of the takeaways from there was that exposing variables (i.e. expvar) is not enough, a package such as go-metrics can be very useful to compute summary statistics (such as mean/max/percentiles of durations, etc)

@pauldix
Copy link
Member

pauldix commented Mar 14, 2015

Closing this since it's covered by #1936, which will be in soon.

@pauldix pauldix closed this as completed Mar 14, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants