Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is there any plan to support Dedicated WQs in the future? #10

Open
b3ng1998 opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Is there any plan to support Dedicated WQs in the future? #10

b3ng1998 opened this issue Jul 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@b3ng1998
Copy link

b3ng1998 commented Jul 2, 2024

No description provided.

@skuma24
Copy link
Contributor

skuma24 commented Jul 11, 2024

Can you please give more details on your requirements? The dedicated WQs are harder to use (e.g., when multiple processes are started or forked and they all try to subscribe to a DSA WQ). Please let us know why SWQs dont work for you.

@b3ng1998
Copy link
Author

b3ng1998 commented Jul 11, 2024

image

  • There will be only one process in our scenario. And according to this table, DWQ has better performance, which is preferred. That's why we want to use DWQ.

  • I conducted some tests following the guidelines provided at https://github.com/intel/dsa-perf-micros/blob/main/doc/sample_command_lines.rst to confirm DWQ's superior performance in the asynchronous offload model. However, I'm uncertain about the performance difference in the synchronous offload model. Could you estimate the performance gap between the two WQs in the synchronous offload model? Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants