Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python 3 support #43

Open
mat128 opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 8 comments
Open

Python 3 support #43

mat128 opened this issue Nov 5, 2015 · 8 comments

Comments

@mat128
Copy link
Contributor

mat128 commented Nov 5, 2015

Title says it all! I believe we aren't that far off :)

@mat128
Copy link
Contributor Author

mat128 commented Nov 5, 2015

I just checked and according to 'caniusepython3':
Almost! 4 blockers.
Check again
4 out of those 4 have no direct dependencies blocking their transition
fake-switches
mockssh
ncclient
sphinxcontrib-httpdomain

I believe the hardest will be ncclient.

@idjaw
Copy link
Contributor

idjaw commented Nov 5, 2015

worth it to note that flexmock is supporting up to 3.3. So if we are targeting 3.4.3, we should watch out for that one.

http://has207.github.io/flexmock/#compatibility

@mat128
Copy link
Contributor Author

mat128 commented Nov 5, 2015

Just get rid of flexmock and use mock now that it's built-in? ;)

@lindycoder
Copy link
Contributor

or we could write a new lib called flexy and make it a wrapper of mock in the syntax of flexmock ;)

@idjaw
Copy link
Contributor

idjaw commented Nov 5, 2015

That would be fun.

@bkabrda
Copy link

bkabrda commented Jan 20, 2016

Hey guys, just FYI, I recently became new maintainer of flexmock and I extended support to 3.4 and 3.5; support for new Python releases will be landing as they come out. Flexmock now lives here: https://github.com/bkabrda/flexmock - feel free to let me know if you hit any issues!

@lindycoder
Copy link
Contributor

Nice, thanks for the info!

@fbouliane
Copy link
Contributor

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants