-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add author authority control metadata from MARC #7724
Comments
Note that $0 doesn't have to contain URIs. They can also be text with a leading parenthesized identifier system identifier, e.g.
for DNB and ISNI respectively. Ones that OpenLibrary supports include
I think they go in You could also ping VIAF and resolve the redirects to get the VIAF ID, although that might be a post-process, rather than part of the import. $ curl -LI http://viaf.org/viaf/sourceID/LC%7Cnr+97026593#skos:Concept
(base) toms-mbp:~ tfmorris$ curl -LI http://viaf.org/viaf/sourceID/LC%7Cnr+97026593#skos:Concept
HTTP/1.0 301 Moved Permanently
Location: https://viaf.org/viaf/sourceID/LC%7Cnr+97026593
Server: BigIP
Connection: Keep-Alive
Content-Length: 0
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Server: Apache-Coyote/1.1
srwRequestMethod: HEAD
[....]
Location: http://viaf.org/viaf/39664214 |
Another example with LOC URI:
|
see #9812 for the now added field to populate on authors for LC NAF id |
From @tfmorris' comment on #7652
See:
https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/bd700.html
And https://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdcntf.html for more details about
$0
and$1
in general. They may appear on a range of fields, so there could be other opportunities to utilize them for our metadata. (Needs investigation)and my response:
This is interesting, I didn't know about these. I'm not sure exactly where to extract these ids to in OL's data model.
Both
$0
and$1
are repeatable, so there could be multiple values. It also seems like the ids and URIs could be anything in general.Existing test data only has
7xx$0
examples:They all happen to be LOC URIs. It looks like we might be able to assume all URIs in this field will be valid web URLs, but I'm not sure that is strictly a given.
I'm thinking adding and making use of these $0 / $1 author sub-fields should be a separate feature (building on this one [#7652 880 linkages ]).
Originally posted by @hornc in #7652 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: