Skip to content

Removal of Storage information #1529

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
JulianWolfDXC opened this issue Apr 10, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed

Removal of Storage information #1529

JulianWolfDXC opened this issue Apr 10, 2025 · 3 comments

Comments

@JulianWolfDXC
Copy link

Hi All

With the latest release (to be honest, I only noticed in the latest release)
I saw that "objectscript.export.noStorage": "true" is no longer an option in the extension.

Is there an alternative?

I have here a question from my Architect about the side effect:

What do you think this will do for the Schema changes when you are working classes with existing data (Lots of it)

What we find now is that when we compile classes, the storage information generates a lot of metadata that may not be needed for our cases.

If you require more information I will gladly provide it.

Thanks in advance.

@isc-bsaviano
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @JulianWolfDXC, this setting was removed as part of an overhaul of the client-side editing workflow. I first announced this back in August on the Developer Community, which is linked to the original Pull Request #1401. The reason for removing this setting is that Storage is an integral part of the class definition like any other class member and it should be source controlled. Can you give me an example of the specific Storage data that you don't want to export/source control?

@JulianWolfDXC
Copy link
Author

O perfect;
Thank you for your answer;
It's ok, there was a little misunderstanding on our side; I will close this.

Appreciate all the effort, thank you.

@isc-bsaviano
Copy link
Contributor

No worries Julian! Please reach out again if you have any questions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants