-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: Introduce knowledge of FreeBSD jails #1167
Conversation
0b53290
to
d48dfe7
Compare
cc @bnoordhuis |
@@ -21,6 +21,32 @@ exports.tmpDir = path.join(exports.testDir, exports.tmpDirName); | |||
|
|||
var opensslCli = null; | |||
|
|||
Object.defineProperty(exports, 'inFbsdJail', {get: function() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please put get:
on a next line.
d48dfe7
to
fa29f2c
Compare
fa29f2c
to
2713538
Compare
There's probably more places which could benefit from the localhost abstraction, but since these be the tests that specifically asserts against |
+1! (can't review though since I don't have a jail) Does this mean that FreeBSD will be moved to the supported systems? |
@brendanashworth that list is (unfortunately, our bad) slightly outdated. What I at least can say (with a smile) is that tests should now pass both on Jenkins – which is run on jails – and in my non-jail environments. As for making it supported I don't think we should rush it just yet. |
+1 for I'm very happy CI become more healthy. I could not figure out why those tests were failed on FreeBSD. Is
|
@shigeki thanks for the feedback! Me and @indutny talked about the most reliable approach to this. Since FreeBSD jails likely represents a small usage we opted to assume that these users could handle providing a "reliable" environment variable instead of trying to figure out what network interface to pass. If Btw, would you be keen to join the @iojs/platform-freebsd team? Always good to have more people caring about improving io.js on FreeBSD. In practise, it means that you'd get cc'ed every time the group is referenced, but no responsibility to fix anything. For more info about platforms, see issue 1006. |
@jbergstroem I agree the jail environment is very rare and more generic approach is preferable. I'm happy to join freebsd team though I don't usually use FreeBSD mainly. For these days, I need to work on it to upgrade openssl as in shigeki@eaf44c8 because clang in FreeBSD is different from that in MacOS and it's hard to know the llvm version from outputs. I'd like to have a more specific information on FreeBSD. |
@shigeki; glad to have you part of the team -- increased visibility is always a good thing. FreeBSD isn't my main platform either, but FreeBSD is such a great platform to debug on so I often find myself using it! Anyway, I'll see to it you're added. Thanks for reviewing the patch. If you think its good to merge, a comment would be appreciated. |
get: function() { | ||
if (process.platform === 'freebsd' && | ||
child_process.execSync('sysctl -n security.jail.jailed').toString() === | ||
'1\n') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You should probably cache the result.
A bunch of style nits but nothing substantial. I'm not really fond of magical properties but we're already doing that for other things. If I can make one suggestion: maybe rename |
FreeBSD jails act differently than your average vm or similar application container. All routing passes through one ip address, which makes things like localhost or 0.0.0.0 resolve differently. Introduce a helper that allows us to verify if we're in a jail and another one for returning an ip address for localhost. Also, skip one test instead of trading additional complexity in common.js for one specific user scenario. PR-URL: nodejs#1167
2713538
to
5d3eefa
Compare
Just fixed all style nits and renamed the function. Skipping caching for now. I'm starting to dislike what |
Here's two test runs on our ci -- one without |
Yay! |
LGTM. I'm surprised you only had to update a handful of tests, we use 127.0.0.1 all over the place. |
@bnoordhuis Yeah, but only to assign - not compare. I can fix this in another PR. |
FreeBSD jails act differently than your average vm or similar application container. All routing passes through one ip address, which makes things like localhost or 0.0.0.0 resolve differently. Introduce a helper that allows us to verify if we're in a jail and another one for returning an ip address for localhost. Also, skip one test instead of trading additional complexity in common.js for one specific user scenario. PR-URL: #1167 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl>
Fixed in c15e81a. Thanks for review and feedback. |
@@ -21,6 +21,35 @@ exports.tmpDir = path.join(exports.testDir, exports.tmpDirName); | |||
|
|||
var opensslCli = null; | |||
|
|||
Object.defineProperty(exports, 'inFreeBSDJail', { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Perhaps the return value of these should be cached? In test-net-local-address-port.js already you're using localhost_ipv4
twice and it's easy to forget that dynamic properties are lazy. See opensslCli
for an already cached property.
This was really a step forward. Thanks for your work here. |
Great job! I'm very happy to see a blue right of FreeBSDs on Jenkins. |
FreeBSD jails act differently than your average vm or similar application container. All routing passes through one ip address, which makes things like localhost or 0.0.0.0 resolve differently.
Introduce a helper that allows us to verify if we're in a jail and another one for returning an ip address for localhost.
Also, skip one test instead of trading additional complexity in common.js for one specific user scenario.
R=@indutny