Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move repo into ipfs or ipfs-shipyard #7

Closed
parkan opened this issue Sep 9, 2019 · 10 comments
Closed

Move repo into ipfs or ipfs-shipyard #7

parkan opened this issue Sep 9, 2019 · 10 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@parkan
Copy link
Collaborator

parkan commented Sep 9, 2019

Following up from the email thread and looping in @Stebalien. Let's move this repo into an ipfs-related org so we can get more eyes on the discussion + code.

There are two choices:

  • Move into ipfs-shipyard: package this as a kind of "mobile SDK" on top of IPFS, similar to how peer-base relates to building dynamic data apps, or how ipfs-provider helps use multiple backends. Pros: loose coupling, lower integration overhead upfront. Cons: somewhat lower visibility, requires ongoing community stewardship.
  • Move into ipfs core: integrate more deeply into the core modules (required to be placed in ipfs org). Pros: potentially deeper integration, lower risk of APIs going out of sync, etc. Cons: upfront evaluation and integration cost, needs core maintainer time.

My suggestion is to move into ipfs-shipyard and make public ASAP, possibly even before merging #5. We saw some amazing energy around this application area at IPFS camp, and not letting it wither is very important. Having a visible place for the discussion of IPFS-on-mobile is a big win even without shipped code. However, It might be worth completing #2, or otherwise clarifying what this module will actually do.

(N.B. most code is currently in #5, waiting on @gfanton to return from vacation)

@parkan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

parkan commented Sep 9, 2019

@Stebalien who else should we invite to review this?

@parkan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

parkan commented Sep 19, 2019

@Stebalien PR updated here and ready for review: #5

let's merge + move into ipfs-shipyard unless you have objections?

@aeddi
Copy link
Member

aeddi commented Jan 22, 2020

Hello @parkan and @Stebalien,

What would you like to do about this issue?

We could move the repo under the IPFS organization directly or make it open-source as is and wait until it is a bit more polished (CI, lifecycle management, streams, etc...) before moving it.

What would you prefer?

@Stebalien
Copy link
Contributor

I'm happy to move it to ipfs-shipyard immediately. However, someone else is going to have to maintain it and review patches.

@alanshaw
Copy link
Member

Please initiate the transfer - I can accept it to ipfs-shipyard.

@aeddi
Copy link
Member

aeddi commented Jan 27, 2020

Ok cool, I just updated the disclaimer and added a roadmap to the README.
I'll initiate the transfer 👍

@aeddi
Copy link
Member

aeddi commented Jan 27, 2020

@alanshaw I can't transfer it directly to ipfs-shipyard because I'm not a member of the organization.
Can I transfer it to your account so you can forward it?

@alanshaw
Copy link
Member

Sure!

@alanshaw
Copy link
Member

Done, let me know who else to add to the team @aeddi

@aeddi
Copy link
Member

aeddi commented Jan 27, 2020

@alanshaw Can you add @glouvigny, @moul and @gfanton please?
Thanks :)

@moul moul added this to the Initial Milestone milestone Oct 27, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants