Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IIIF #26

Open
davidar opened this issue Jun 7, 2016 · 6 comments
Open

IIIF #26

davidar opened this issue Jun 7, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@davidar
Copy link
Member

davidar commented Jun 7, 2016

Goal: automate the process of getting IIIF manifests and assets into IPFS

Related: #25

@mekarpeles
Copy link

mekarpeles commented Jun 7, 2016

Cool goal! @davidar also archive.org is trying to make a shim to enable any archive.org item to be accessed/served over IPFS. Perhaps this can be done in a way which gives us the IIIF use case for free as well. I'll talk to @edsilv and @aeschylus about this tomorrow

@davidar
Copy link
Member Author

davidar commented Jun 28, 2016

Possibly relevant:

Cc: @klokan

@edsilv
Copy link

edsilv commented Jun 28, 2016

Using TMS would require a shim - if it's a IIIF tile source, the URIs of tiles need to conform to /id/region/size/rotation/quality.format.

https://github.com/IIIF/awesome-iiif#image-server-shims

@edsilv
Copy link

edsilv commented Jun 29, 2016

To keep the server as essentially a "dumb pipe" you'd want a client-side js shim of some kind, rather than a ruby or similar one. Otherwise, everyone pinning this content on their IPFS node would also have to wrap it in a special image server, which kind of defeats the object of IPFS :-)

https://twitter.com/edsilv/status/691626389099913217

@daviddias
Copy link
Member

Oh, wow! Just found this issue, didn't realize that there were conversations about IIIF before the work we did for this IIIF :)

So, what's next? :D.

@edsilv
Copy link

edsilv commented Jul 27, 2017

@diasdavid Decentralised IIIF Collections? :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants