Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: use common ipfs/*-actions in sync-release-assets #8609

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 15, 2021
Merged

Conversation

galargh
Copy link
Contributor

@galargh galargh commented Dec 14, 2021

I want to replace the ipfs build, init and ipfs daemon start logic here with common actions(https://github.com/ipfs/download-ipfs-distribution-action + https://github.com/ipfs/start-ipfs-daemon-action) to minimise duplication. This is part of work related to this issue: #8511

The new logic replaces ipfs build logic with downloading latest stable(non rc) release of go-ipfs from dist.ipfs.io.

@galargh galargh requested a review from lidel December 14, 2021 18:48
@welcome
Copy link

welcome bot commented Dec 14, 2021

Thank you for submitting this PR!
A maintainer will be here shortly to review it.
We are super grateful, but we are also overloaded! Help us by making sure that:

  • The context for this PR is clear, with relevant discussion, decisions
    and stakeholders linked/mentioned.

  • Your contribution itself is clear (code comments, self-review for the
    rest) and in its best form. Follow the code contribution
    guidelines

    if they apply.

Getting other community members to do a review would be great help too on complex PRs (you can ask in the chats/forums). If you are unsure about something, just leave us a comment.
Next steps:

  • A maintainer will triage and assign priority to this PR, commenting on
    any missing things and potentially assigning a reviewer for high
    priority items.

  • The PR gets reviews, discussed and approvals as needed.

  • The PR is merged by maintainers when it has been approved and comments addressed.

We currently aim to provide initial feedback/triaging within two business days. Please keep an eye on any labelling actions, as these will indicate priorities and status of your contribution.
We are very grateful for your contribution!

Copy link
Member

@lidel lidel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, thank you @galargh !

ipfs init --profile flatfs,server
ipfs daemon --enable-gc=false &
while (! ipfs id --api "/ip4/127.0.0.1/tcp/5001"); do sleep 1; done
- name: Wait for go-ipfs to be ready
Copy link
Member

@lidel lidel Dec 15, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@galargh Can we update ipfs/start-ipfs-daemon-action to include a version of this additional check?
iiuc we want to ensure the ipfs id | jq .Addresses list is not empty before continuing. I believe we had CI randomly fail due to race condition sometimes because libp2p transports did not finish startup

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants