Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Switch to .tech #54

Closed
lidel opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #55
Closed

Switch to .tech #54

lidel opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #55
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization

Comments

@lidel
Copy link
Member

lidel commented Nov 10, 2022

Should use dist.ipfs.tech instead of dist.ipfs.io

Ref. https://github.com/protocol/bifrost-infra/issues/2018

Note: this can be picked up after https://github.com/protocol/bifrost-infra/issues/2186 is resolved

@lidel lidel added kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels Nov 10, 2022
@lidel lidel closed this as completed in #55 Nov 10, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug A bug in existing code (including security flaws) need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant