You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the default column widths of the experiments table aren't aware of the lengths of the data and headers they contain, so they can be cut off by default. While truncation from #1142 makes this not look absolutely broken, some columns being truncated by default could be considered a bad look that we need to fix considering something like native HTML tables adapt to their contents' widths.
Screenshot of default widths with a slightly contrived example of columns that exemplify this:
Do we want to tackle this directly and make column widths adaptable by default, or are related solutions like #1142 and #1259 enough to make this a non-issue? If it's the latter, we may want to add title attributes to cells as well as headers (really, we may just want to do that anyway).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, the default column widths of the experiments table aren't aware of the lengths of the data and headers they contain, so they can be cut off by default. While truncation from #1142 makes this not look absolutely broken, some columns being truncated by default could be considered a bad look that we need to fix considering something like native HTML tables adapt to their contents' widths.
Screenshot of default widths with a slightly contrived example of columns that exemplify this:

Do we want to tackle this directly and make column widths adaptable by default, or are related solutions like #1142 and #1259 enough to make this a non-issue? If it's the latter, we may want to add
title
attributes to cells as well as headers (really, we may just want to do that anyway).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: