You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Sect 4.5 -
From the IVOA perspective of keeping separate time, space and energy domains, should we adopt two parameters: one for scanning in spatial coordinates (for instance sky_scan_mode) and the other for frequency scanning (for instance freq_scan_mode)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Can we imagine some vocabulary rule which allows combination of two terms ? So that we may use the same FIELD for either axis scan exclusively or combination of both ? This to avoid too much empty FIELDS in case.
We agree on the proposal of keeping one parameter, accompanied by a vocabulary and its rules. We could imagine scan_mode as composed by two terms, the first one (always present) defining the sky scanning mode and the second (optional) describing the frequency scanning mode if present. As an example, a frequency switching observation could have scan_mode='on, freq_switch' while an on-the-fly map could have scan_mode='otf_map' only.
Sect 4.5 -
From the IVOA perspective of keeping separate time, space and energy domains, should we adopt two parameters: one for scanning in spatial coordinates (for instance sky_scan_mode) and the other for frequency scanning (for instance freq_scan_mode)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: