Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Another multiply with overflow panic #13

Closed
5225225 opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

Another multiply with overflow panic #13

5225225 opened this issue Dec 17, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@5225225
Copy link
Contributor

5225225 commented Dec 17, 2021

fn main() {
    let decoder = yaxpeax_x86::amd64::InstDecoder::default();
    drop(decoder.decode_slice(&[98, 242, 253, 15, 138, 98, 242, 253, 15, 138]));
}

thread 'main' panicked at 'attempt to multiply with overflow', /home/jess/.cargo/registry/src/github.com-1ecc6299db9ec823/yaxpeax-x86-1.1.2/src/long_mode/../shared/evex.in:241:11

The fuzzer I'm using is just

#![no_main]
use libfuzzer_sys::fuzz_target;

fuzz_target!(|data: &[u8]| {
    let decoder = yaxpeax_x86::amd64::InstDecoder::default();
    drop(decoder.decode_slice(data));
});

(the drop is to ignore the must_use on a Result).

Probably should add this to the repo and run it yourself. See https://github.com/rust-fuzz/cargo-fuzz

@iximeow
Copy link
Owner

iximeow commented Dec 17, 2021

i was wondering how you were fuzzing - i'd written off cargo fuzz maybe a little too eagerly as i figured it would mostly-uninterestingly be exploring evex decoding logic. which, i suppose, is exactly what could have used some more scrutiny.

this is a foil of the other overflow you found

        if let Some(size) = overridden_size {
          instruction.disp *= size;
        } else {
          apply_disp_scale(instruction);
        }

where disp is signed-in-spirit-but-unsigned-in-practice. so that's a wrapping_mul now. and the other fix probably should have been wrapping_mul too. so it is now.

on cargo fuzz: i figured out that all the cargo fuzz issues i've had in the past were due to my having an ancient version of cargo fuzz installed. i was wondering how you got it working without fiddling with llvm pass manager arguments and other weird hacks... it doesn't seem to be shouting about specific fuzz cases so maybe these were the only two? haha 😬

@5225225
Copy link
Contributor Author

5225225 commented Dec 17, 2021

Yeah, I think there was a brief time maybe a few months ago where cargo-fuzz didn't work out of the box (because rust was moving to a different llvm / pass manager or whatever it was).

But nowadays (cargo-fuzz 0.11.0), it works flawlessly for me. On linux, granted, so your mileage may vary if you're on windows/mac.

@iximeow
Copy link
Owner

iximeow commented Dec 19, 2021

between the immediate issue being fixed, and that there are now in-tree cargo fuzz targets for this (and that i'm running them), i'm going to close this as being resolved

@iximeow iximeow closed this as completed Dec 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants