Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is the GT pose of real_val accurate enough? #20

Open
Liuchongpei opened this issue Aug 13, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Is the GT pose of real_val accurate enough? #20

Liuchongpei opened this issue Aug 13, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@Liuchongpei
Copy link

Hi, You mentioned in the readme "the ground truth of real training data generated by this method is not good enough." Is the GT pose in real_val accurate? When I run the NOCS detection code, the GT pose visualization image will be generated as shown below. It seems that the GT pose is not accurate. Have you encountered this problem?
2345截图20200813153632
2345截图20200813153709
@LyuJ1998
Copy link
Collaborator

I encountered this also.That's why we generate the labels by ourselves, but we have to be consistent with the NOCS on val dataset to fairly compare with them.

@Liuchongpei
Copy link
Author

Have you reproduced a more accurate GT pose of val_dateset? If yes, can you share it with me?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@LyuJ1998 @Liuchongpei