You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Requirement - what kind of business use case are you trying to solve?
As we're gradually introducing delayed sampling into clients (#1861), our current started_spans/started_traces metrics become less meaningful and do not reflect what happens.
Problem - what in Jaeger blocks you from solving the requirement?
Metrics are currently annotated with a sampled label (yes/no), but when sampling is delayed we don't know if the span/trace will be sampled later. In reverse, finished_spans metric does not have a label for sampled state.
Proposal - what do you suggest to solve the problem or improve the existing situation?
Introduce a 3rd value delayed for the sampled label on the xxx_started metrics.
Add sampled label to the xxx_finished metrics (currently it does not have this label).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Requirement - what kind of business use case are you trying to solve?
As we're gradually introducing delayed sampling into clients (#1861), our current
started_spans
/started_traces
metrics become less meaningful and do not reflect what happens.Problem - what in Jaeger blocks you from solving the requirement?
Metrics are currently annotated with a
sampled
label (yes/no), but when sampling is delayed we don't know if the span/trace will be sampled later. In reverse,finished_spans
metric does not have a label for sampled state.Proposal - what do you suggest to solve the problem or improve the existing situation?
delayed
for thesampled
label on thexxx_started
metrics.sampled
label to thexxx_finished
metrics (currently it does not have this label).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: