Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Discrepancy of client-ID, prependID and findComponent #573

Closed
eclipse-faces-bot opened this issue Jun 16, 2009 · 13 comments
Closed

Discrepancy of client-ID, prependID and findComponent #573

eclipse-faces-bot opened this issue Jun 16, 2009 · 13 comments

Comments

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link

see https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1153

Creating a form with prependId="false" will lead to client-IDs of child components of this form where the
path to be passed to findComponent() being different then the client-ID.
This leads to confusion, especially now with compositecomponents and f:ajax where referencing
components outside of the same namingcontainer will be used more often.

This could for example be solved by making the form not behave like a namingcontainer in
findComponent() if prependId == false.

Environment

Operating System: All
Platform: All
URL: https://javaserverfaces.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1153

Affected Versions

[2.1]

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
Reported by ioss

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
Was assigned to javaserverfowner

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@edburns said:
Move to unscheduled target milestone

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@edburns said:
Prepare to delete "spec" subcomponent.

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
rogerk said:
cat2

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@edburns said:
javadoc

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@edburns said:
components

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@edburns said:
These are targeted at 2.1.

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@edburns said:
This one seems too subtle to change at this point in the lifetime of JSF.

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
Marked as won't fix on Tuesday, June 8th 2010, 7:17:35 am

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
@manfredriem said:
Closing resolved issue out

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

@glassfishrobot Commented
This issue was imported from java.net JIRA JAVASERVERFACES_SPEC_PUBLIC-573

@eclipse-faces-bot
Copy link
Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants