Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: #3269

Open
1 of 3 tasks
Vicki190 opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Open
1 of 3 tasks

[Bug]: #3269

Vicki190 opened this issue Mar 3, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@Vicki190
Copy link

Vicki190 commented Mar 3, 2025

JASP Version

0.19.3

Commit ID

No response

JASP Module

Reliability

What analysis are you seeing the problem on?

Coefficient alpha

What OS are you seeing the problem on?

Windows 11, Windows 10

Bug Description

Trying to run an reliablity analysis - coefficent alpha if item dropped - keeps crashing

This analysis terminated unexpectedly.

Error in A1 %*% M2: requires numeric/complex matrix/vector arguments

Stack trace
tryCatchOne(expr, names, parentenv, handlers[[1]])

doTryCatch(return(expr), name, parentenv, handler)

withCallingHandlers(expr = analysis(jaspResults = jaspResults, dataset = dataset, options = options), error = .addStackTrace)

analysis(jaspResults = jaspResults, dataset = dataset, options = options)

.frequentistComputeItemResults(jaspResults, dataset, options, model)

.seLambda3(dtUse[, -i])

.seLambda1(X, VC)

.varCM(X)

To receive assistance with this problem, please report the message above at: https://jasp-stats.org/bug-reports

Expected Behaviour

table with cronbach's alpha and values for if item dropped

Steps to Reproduce

Tick the coefficent alpha (if item dropped) box under individual item statistics

Image

Log (if any)

No response

More Debug Information

No response

Final Checklist

  • I have included a screenshot showcasing the issue, if possible.
  • I have included a JASP file (zipped) or data file that causes the crash/bug, if applicable.
  • I have accurately described the bug, and steps to reproduce it.
@tomtomme
Copy link
Member

tomtomme commented Mar 3, 2025

can you try this?

Image

from #3237

@tomtomme tomtomme added Waiting for requester If waiting for a long time it is reasonable to close an issue and removed Bug labels Mar 3, 2025
@Vicki190
Copy link
Author

Vicki190 commented Mar 4, 2025

Thank you, that worked!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Waiting for requester If waiting for a long time it is reasonable to close an issue label Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants