Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Clarity in README for party of >1 #12

Closed
davidkassa opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Clarity in README for party of >1 #12

davidkassa opened this issue Sep 15, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@davidkassa
Copy link
Contributor

It's unclear whether I need to run a separate instance for each individual on a reservation or whether this will auto-checkin the entire party. I'm guessing the latter. It would be nice if there were a note in the README for this.
@jdholtz
Copy link
Owner

jdholtz commented Sep 15, 2022

It will check in everyone under the same reservation. I’ll add this to the README. Thanks for the suggestion.

@jdholtz jdholtz added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 15, 2022
@jdholtz
Copy link
Owner

jdholtz commented Sep 16, 2022

Hey @davidkassa. I added this clarification to the README. Please let me know if this clears up any doubts related to this issue.

@davidkassa
Copy link
Contributor Author

davidkassa commented Sep 16, 2022 via email

@schmeed schmeed mentioned this issue Oct 14, 2022
Closed
@edshaw42 edshaw42 mentioned this issue Feb 9, 2023
Closed
@darryllee darryllee mentioned this issue Aug 2, 2023
Closed
@vartana vartana mentioned this issue Nov 27, 2023
Closed
@wpkato wpkato mentioned this issue Jan 27, 2024
Closed
@schmeed schmeed mentioned this issue Jan 9, 2025
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@davidkassa @jdholtz