You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First, let me say thank you for such a great program. I have found GeomLoss to be very helpful in my research.
Second, I noticed a discrepancy between the dual and primal losses for small values of the blur parameter when I was attempting to use the solutions to GeomLoss to perform some barycentric projections. I've attached some sample code that should replicate the observation. I also tried some smaller scaling values and get the same problem.
Hello,
First, let me say thank you for such a great program. I have found GeomLoss to be very helpful in my research.
Second, I noticed a discrepancy between the dual and primal losses for small values of the blur parameter when I was attempting to use the solutions to GeomLoss to perform some barycentric projections. I've attached some sample code that should replicate the observation. I also tried some smaller scaling values and get the same problem.
Thanks for any help you can provide!
geomloss_transport_matrix.py.zip
software
MacOSX 11.6
GeomLoss version 0.2.4
Python 3.8
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: