You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, we first render the galaxy at the location given by the variational parameters and then convolve with the pixelated PSF. For the same reason that we cannot get sub-pixel locations of stars without interpolating the PSF, this will make small galaxies will be difficult to locate accurately.
A better way would be to render the pre-convolution galaxy image at a fixed location and then convolve with a PSF that has been interpolated to the location given by the variational parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It might be interesting to compare this to Dustin's idea of expressing the FFT of the pre-convolution MOG in closed form. My intuition is that this will work better, but the proof will be in the pudding.
Currently, we first render the galaxy at the location given by the variational parameters and then convolve with the pixelated PSF. For the same reason that we cannot get sub-pixel locations of stars without interpolating the PSF, this will make small galaxies will be difficult to locate accurately.
A better way would be to render the pre-convolution galaxy image at a fixed location and then convolve with a PSF that has been interpolated to the location given by the variational parameters.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: