-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Flaky test #313
Comments
Originally posted by @jfmengels in #308 (comment) |
Originally posted by @lishaduck in #308 (comment) |
Originally posted by @lishaduck in #308 (comment) |
Originally posted by @lishaduck in #308 (comment) Footnotes
|
Originally posted by @lishaduck in #308 (comment) |
I haven't had the time to delve into it more, so my thoughts are still the same as what is written above. Do you have the power to re-run CI runs by the way or is it only me? (Because if you can, then this is annoying but more easily bypassable). |
No, I don't unfortunately (surprisingly, GitHub has a single secure default for actions 🎉 🤣). |
What? Another flake: This time in "should retrieve "-- UNEXPECTED ERROR ------------------------------------------------------------
I ran into an unexpected error. Please open an issue at the following link:
https://github.com/jfmengels/node-elm-review/issues/new
Please include this error message and as much detail as you can provide. Running
with --debug might give additional information. If you can, please provide a
setup that makes it easy to reproduce the error. That will make it much easier
to fix the issue.
Below is the error that was encountered.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'Elm')
at initWithoutWorker (<local-path>/lib/app-wrapper.js:[145](https://github.com/jfmengels/node-elm-review/actions/runs/11902573547/job/33167861766#step:10:152):29)
at Object.init (<local-path>/lib/app-wrapper.js:25:10)
at Object.initializeApp (<local-path>/lib/runner.js:112:26)
at <local-path>/lib/main.js:81:27
at async Promise.all (index 0)
at async runElmReview (<local-path>/lib/main.js:79:19)
at async main (<local-path>/lib/main.js:271:5)
"
at Object.test (test/compiler-flag.test.js:13:1) I just noticed that we've got two stacktraces here. Will need to keep that in mind. It makes me think of 8fbe6f6, but that didn't change any runtime code. |
I'll try to get to this this week. This was frustrating me, so I took a break to start a "small" side project to help make TS more Elmy, but the scope of that is frustrating me as well, so I'm back :) |
Oh, fixed by #322 (hopefully). |
Oh, reopening this as we hit this again, unfortunately. It is a bit better though! |
I've cleared the cache just in case 🤷 |
Can you rerun https://github.com/jfmengels/node-elm-review/actions/runs/12214733248 to see if it helped? |
It passed this time. |
Hopefully that was it 🤞 |
Nope, flaked on #317. |
Moving this thread so I don't lose track of it: ↓
Originally posted by @lishaduck in #308 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: