Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Apache Log4j Vulnerability issue - Black Duck #65

Closed
josephreji opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by jfrog/build-info#754 or #68
Closed

Apache Log4j Vulnerability issue - Black Duck #65

josephreji opened this issue Aug 31, 2023 · 2 comments · Fixed by jfrog/build-info#754 or #68
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@josephreji
Copy link

How can we help?

Our product is using build-info-extractor-gradle for publishing artifacts to JFrog artifactory repository. Couple of months back our team introduced vulnerability scanning tools. One of them is Black Duck. We are getting multiple critical warnings from that tool due to the internal dependency with Apache Log4j . We upgraded the build-info-extractor-gradle to the latest 5.1. 4. But still we are getting the same warning. Now it became a compliance issue for our product. Could you please advise how to solve this?

Please find more details below :-

build.gradle -> -gradle -> org.jfrog.buildinfo:build-info-extractor-gradle:5.1.3 -> org.jfrog.buildinfo:build-info-extractor:2.41.4 -> commons-logging:commons-logging:1.2 -> log4j:log4j:1.2.17

https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jfrog.buildinfo/build-info-extractor-gradle/5.1.4

Published on: 12/20/19
Updated on: 1/3/23
Base score: 9.8
Exploitability: 3.9

Description: Apache Log4j is vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE). This allows a remote attacker to send a crafted serialized payload that, when processed by Log4j, will execute arbitrary code. This can occur if Log4j is deserializing untrusted network traffic.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17571
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-17571

@josephreji josephreji added the question Further information is requested label Aug 31, 2023
@yahavi yahavi reopened this Sep 5, 2023
@yahavi yahavi mentioned this issue Sep 5, 2023
1 task
@yahavi yahavi closed this as completed in #68 Sep 7, 2023
@yahavi
Copy link
Member

yahavi commented Sep 7, 2023

Hey @josephreji,
Thanks for bringing up this problem!
We've rolled out v5.1.6 to address it.
Check it out here:

Your feedback would be greatly valued.

@josephreji
Copy link
Author

@yahavi That's awesome!. Thanks for fixing this issue so quickly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
2 participants