Is src/test/webapp/component/**/*.ts ts configfr exlusion usefull?

[DamnClin]

In tsconfig for vue app there is an exclusion for "src/test/webapp/component/**/*.ts", is this still usefull?

[renanfranca]

Hello @DamnClin ,

I would like to take this opportunity in our discussion to ask how files that do not have 100% test coverage should be excluded.

For instance, if you look at this comment regarding the files I will add with the vue-oauth2-keycloak module. What I thought was to add each file individually as an exclusion. What do you think?

[DamnClin]

Hello @DamnClin ,

I would like to take this opportunity in our discussion to ask how files that do not have 100% test coverage should be excluded.

For instance, if you look at this comment regarding the files I will add with the vue-oauth2-keycloak module. What I thought was to add each file individually as an exclusion. What do you think?

This is not a coverage exclusion but a build exclusion :).

For coverage exclusion my take is: as long as we can't get a proper merge we should remove this metric. I think not metric is better than a wrong one

[renanfranca]

Hello @DamnClin ,
I would like to take this opportunity in our discussion to ask how files that do not have 100% test coverage should be excluded.
For instance, if you look at this comment regarding the files I will add with the vue-oauth2-keycloak module. What I thought was to add each file individually as an exclusion. What do you think?

This is not a coverage exclusion but a build exclusion :).

Oh, my bad!

For coverage exclusion my take is: as long as we can't get a proper merge we should remove this metric. I think not metric is better than a wrong one

Should we remove the code coverage 100% metric from the frontend generated apps?

[renanfranca]

For coverage exclusion my take is: as long as we can't get a proper merge we should remove this metric. I think not metric is better than a wrong one

Should we remove the code coverage 100% metric from the frontend generated apps?

@DamnClin : as this code coverage discussion is not the main topic of this issue, I created a discussion here:

• Code coverage 100% for front end generated apps #10927