You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried fuzzing 1.7.0 with the help of @bradleyjkemp's excellent fuzzing method from #271 and ran into a pretty interesting panic. It is reproduced by using a file with a single 0. This reproduces the panic:
I'd like to take this moment to re-state the case for continuous fuzzing of protoparse. It's a prime example of a library that will benefit from it, since it fundamentally works on arbitrary user-supplied bytes. As already mentioned by Bradley, there are platforms that provide free fuzzing for open source projects, and it'd be great to integrate it with protoreflect.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
I tried fuzzing 1.7.0 with the help of @bradleyjkemp's excellent fuzzing method from #271 and ran into a pretty interesting panic. It is reproduced by using a file with a single
0
. This reproduces the panic:I'd like to take this moment to re-state the case for continuous fuzzing of
protoparse
. It's a prime example of a library that will benefit from it, since it fundamentally works on arbitrary user-supplied bytes. As already mentioned by Bradley, there are platforms that provide free fuzzing for open source projects, and it'd be great to integrate it with protoreflect.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: