-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 663
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No synchronisation after one bad round #2732
Comments
You have to set the "Previous Value" new (in the Settings Menu) |
Yes, this is the solution if it has happened. But in my opinion the system should recover by itself. |
The Software is not designed like this. |
I don't think that you are right. The initial message "rate too high" is due to a reading error which according to the FAQ can always happen. My limit should filter out such impossible values and this works fine. But if next value is again in the limits (no reading error) the system should recover by itself. |
You can use this "feature" in both ways, look at your meter what the maximum thruput is and then measure your maximum "normal" waterflow. Did you also check the parameter "Maximum Age of Previous Value after Startup" |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
The Problem
Several weeks everything works fine, but today I found that since one week I have only errors. Looking in the csv file shows, that one measurement was to high (7 instaed of 1), but already the next value was good again. But this good value was marked as an error and all following values too. The reason seems to be the used timestamp to determine the rate. The timestamp to calculate the gradient is always the one of the last measured value , but as value the last correct value which of course is longer ago. So the calculated gradient is always to high and gets worser with each new measurement.
My configuration is an allowed rate of 0.04 per minute and measurements were taken every 5 minutes.
Last good measurement: 2023-11-30T07:29:48+0100,main,33890.987
One wrong measurement: 2023-11-30T07:34:48+0100,main,33897.075 five minutes later, rate too high, 1.218 correct calculation
Next measurement: 2023-11-30T07:39:49+0100,main,33891.200 ten minutes after last good measurement, marked as rate too high (0.042) but the correct rate since last good measurement is 0.021 per minute which is below my allowed limit.
Version
15.3
Logfile
Expected Behavior
No response
Screenshots
No response
Additional Context
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: