You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Something Michael K said in the meeting about using simple regression for multimodal target distributions being a poor approximation and only able to predict the avergae.
I believe this could have a big effect, as we have many different particle types with different kinematic spectra (e.g. energy), yet the regression network is the same and just tries to predict a single value.
Need to find a good reference for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Despite my best efforts in #234, in the end I have reverted the multi-bin / multimodal loss to simple regression in TF #253, because despite promising initial checks, the final physics performance after a long training was not competitive.
Something Michael K said in the meeting about using simple regression for multimodal target distributions being a poor approximation and only able to predict the avergae.
I believe this could have a big effect, as we have many different particle types with different kinematic spectra (e.g. energy), yet the regression network is the same and just tries to predict a single value.
Need to find a good reference for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: